featured slide

Bloggerized by Nauman Khan

featured slide

Bloggerized by Nauman Khan

featured slide

Bloggerized by Nauman Khan

featured slide

Bloggerized by Nauman Khan

featured slide

Bloggerized by Nauman Khan

Wednesday, January 16, 2013

Hyundai HCD-14 Genesis concept unveiled at Detroit Auto Show



Hyundai HCD-14 Genesis concept profile

The HCD-14 Genesis is meant to push Hyundai further into luxury territory with sophisticated styling and 3D gesture recognition technology.

Hyundai HCD-14 Genesis front three quarter

The eye tracking feature allows the driver to select a function, while the 3D system allows him or her to use minimal gestures to make their selection.

These new technologies help the driver control audio, navigation, HVAC, and smartphone connectivity functions. Combined with a head-up display, Hyundai says eye tracking and gesture recognition keep the driver’s eyes on the road the majority of the time.

This may be a concept car, but Hyundai decided to make it drivable as well. However, the drive train is more realistic than the styling or futuristic infotainment interface. Under the hood is the same 5.0-liter Tau V8 from the Genesis 5.0 R-Spec and Equus. It’s mated to an eight-speed, paddle-shifted automatic transmission.

To give the HCD-14 Genesis a sporty feel, Hyundai also gave it five-link front and rear suspension and performance tires. Electronic nannies include a yaw control system and multi-mode power steering.

The HCD-14 is just a concept car, but seeing as it shares its name with Hyundai’s current premium sedan, it seems likely that certain features will make it onto future production cars. The styling and infotainment system are the standouts, but whether they can make it to production undiluted is the big question. First, Hyundai should do something about that grille.

BB10 phones expected to release during the first quarter of 2013.


BB10 Gets Security Nod for Government Use

RIM is ready for active duty. 
Photo: Roberto Baldwin/Wired
While the iPhone has the app market wrapped up, and Android touts its customization bona fides, BlackBerry has traditionally been the security phone of choice for businesses and super spies. RIM can continue to ride the security wave with news that its unreleased platform is ready for government duty.
On Thursday RIM announced that BlackBerry 10 smartphones and enterprise servers had received FIPS (Federal Information Processing Standard Publication) 140-2 certification from the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). In order to pass, a device must have certified encryption algorithms when data is transmitted or the phone is at rest.
One of the features RIM has been most proud of is its security. Thursday’s announcement is good news for a company that has been struggling to remain relevantin the post-iPhone era. This is the first time a RIM product was certified before its release. Government agencies can start using the devices as soon as they become available on the market.
RIM is expected to release new BB10 phones during the first quarter of 2013.

Cadillac unveils the ELR plug-in in Detroit




The technology has already been proven in the Chevy Volt, and the ELR’s luxury appointments should soften the blow of the high price of that technology.

The Cadillac Cimarron was possibly the lowest point in the entire 111 year history of Cadillac. Their decision to sloppily re badge a Chevy Cavalier and then double the price was the supreme example of everything that was wrong with the American automotive industry for years to come. Cadillac has, in recent years, done a much better job of distinguishing its brand from the rest of GM, but those of us who remember the Cimarron still got nervous when Cadillac announced it would be building a plug-in vehicle based on the Chevy Volt. The Convert concept, which the new plug-in was based on, looked promising, but it wasn’t until the debut of the ELR production model at the Detroit Auto Show that fears of a plug-in Cimarron could be laid to rest.

To start with, the ELR doesn't just have a different body, it has a different body style altogether; it’s a coupe, not a sedan. And although we certainly wouldn't call the Volt ugly, the ELR is definitely more attractive. The drive train is the same as the Volt’s, with an electric motor and battery pack that can carry the car for 35 miles on a single charge, and then there is a 1.4-liter range extender. With a 240V charger, the battery can be fully charged in about 4.5 hours. Cadillac hasn't set a price for the car yet, but with the huge void in the market between the $39,000 Volt and the $100,000+ plug-in vehicles like the Fisker Karma, the business case for a more luxurious and pricier car to slot in above the Volt is pretty clear. The ELR is a solid contender, and it’s not difficult to imagine that it could be one of the more popular plug-ins around.

Facebook launched Graph Search


FACEBOOK Takes On Google, But Private, Personalized, Social Search Has No Clear Winner Yet


Screen Shot 2013-01-15 at 18.57.55
Facebook launched Graph Search today, its own version of a private, personalized social search engine. It’s somewhat of a competitor to Google’s “Search Plus Your World” – Google’s more recent take on blending personal data with that of the greater web. Although Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg was careful to frame it as not being a web search product, that statement was not entirely accurate. It is web search, after all – it’s search and it’s on the web. It’s just not web search as we know it.
Don’t be mistaken – these two companies, Google and Facebook, are now battling for your private data, and to some extent they’re both betting on personalization as the future of search.
Facebook, as we know, has over 1 billion users, and today noted that it has over 240 billion photos as well, and “more than a trillion connections.” In other words, it’s home to a wealth of private data, which Google can’t know about and index. A vast landscape built in Google’s blindspot. That’s a niche it would be ignorant to ignore, obviously.
Whether that niche is the definitive future of search, however, is yet to be proven.
Facebook Graph Search, the company says, is rolling out slowly. It will leverage the social network’s own private data, honoring users’ privacy settings in the process of building this new search engine. Some things aren’t yet included, like individual Facebook posts and Open Graph actions (like song listens), the company says. But they’re coming.
Screenshot-PeopleWhoLikeThingsILike
It will make Facebook far more usable, and will therefore suck up even more of users’ time from Google Sites, which will be another blow to Google’s ads business.
Facebook users will be able to search for friends, photos, restaurants and businesses nearby, games and music friends play, photos friends like and more. Much of this you can do on Facebook today, it just hasn’t been well-organized. Facebook currently has a search interface, but Graph Search will re-envision Facebook Search for a more powerful combinations of various search queries – “restaurants in New York liked by chefs,” “cities my family have been to,” “photos of friends from before 1999,” etc. Facebook Search is all about exploring your personal social connections, and those across Facebook.
Screenshot-PeopleNamedChris
This is a major step forward for defining what Facebook is to users: a social network turned search engine. And while it’s true that Facebook has leveraged a wealth of private data to build its engine on top of, it’s not the only company which is capable of doing so. Yes, Google may be starting from the other direction (search -> social instead of social -> search), but it’s not powerless here, despite the giant, and growing, private web behind Facebook’s doors.
Google, too, has been building its own social graph of sorts for its user base. While those visiting the destination site Google Plus may chalk up Google’s social efforts as that of building a Facebook clone with a few Google-fied bells and whistles, like video Hangouts, for example, Google’s true social efforts lie in unifying its user data across all its properties and services. Over the past year or so, Google has shut down unneeded and underused services (yes, including social search startup Aardvark!). It has combined its various user Privacy Policies into one, and have made users’ Google login the identification they use everywhere on Google from checking email to watching YouTube to searching for answers. It has streamlined Google and added a social layer to all of it.
YouTube is a pretty big social network, too, when you think about. 800 million monthly uniques. And Google hasn’t even fully realized the potential of switching on social on its mobile install base, via Android.
The company has access to other private data, too, which recently became available for public search tests. In August, it began letting users search their Gmail messages using Google.com. December, it then enabled an opt-in feature that lets users search for their online purchases, reservations, and other events using Google.com. The trick here is being able peer in users’ inboxes, and identify messages like order confirmations and receipts. It only feels vaguely intrusive because we believe our email is private. It’s not.
And Gmail, one could argue, is a social network filled with far more practical data for searching than “which photos my friends liked.”
Yet when it comes to the less practical – those photos, for instance – Facebook has the clear edge. 240 billion photos is just massive scale. Google, meanwhile, has let its Picasa photo-sharing service stagnate, confusingly, while also offering Google Plus Photos in its main social product. It’s time that Google stepped up its game on this front, and begin to merge the two properties properly, and transition users. (As a side note, Google offered instant (automatic, background) photo uploads from mobile a year and half before Facebook did. It also now has a dedicated easy upload app for YouTube.)
Photos could easily be Facebook’s battle to win.
As for the other data – venues suggestions and recommendations, travel ideas, etc. – well, remember that Google bought Zagat in 2011. Yes, Google saw this whole thing coming. Who hasn’t? Google is still making good on that purchase, too, having only recently relaunched Zagat on mobile. It has also merged Google Places (its business listings) into Google Plus Local. In Google’s preferred vision of the future, you might search for a restaurant, dine, rate and review the meal, and pay the establishment, all on Google. This could happen. That’s a lot of proprietary data, too.
Perhaps the biggest reason of all as to why the search battle is just now beginning is because we don’t yet know that search built on social search will definitely win long-term. Does social show early progress, in terms of Facebook ads, and specifically Exchange Ads? Yes it does. Can it transition that to mobile? Also possible.
Social search, likes, recommendations, etc., however, are built upon a potentially flawed idea: that our friends know best. They do not. Not always. Some friends have different tastes, and different interests. And some have just poor taste, let’s be honest. Does the fact that a friend bought a G&E washer mean I should too? (Maybe it was just on sale.) Does a friend’s check-in at Chez Louie equate to a recommendation? (Not without their accompanying rating or review. The food may have been terrible.) My friend went to Uruguay – should I consider that for my vacation? (They may have hated their hotel, who knows?).
A check-in, a place, a photo is not an answer. There’s more data needed here.
Then what about Facebook Likes? Sadly, Facebook advertisers have corrupted that data – “like our page for a coupon or deal!” Okay, liked. Hmm, now does the need for a discount mean a recommendation for a brand, though? That becomes less clear the more promotions are run.
Screenshot-PhotosOfFriendsBefore1999
While building a graph around what our friends and network is doing is an obvious no brainer for Facebook, it’s not necessarily the “next new thing” for search.
And if social is not the future of search, or if it’s only one small part, where then, is search going?Real answers. Facebook alluded to this in its announcement, saying exactly that: Graph Search is about answers, not links. But it doesn’t yet really have them.
Google is building its own answers engine too, however. It launched Knowledge Graph Search last year, which now delivers answers to fact-based questions. It launched a predictive, personalized search interface called Google Now on mobile, which knows what you need to know…and before you know you need to know it. That’s pretty disruptive.
Facebook is welcome entrant in search, but the games aren’t over just because it finally stepped onto the field.

Saturday, January 5, 2013

Five things Microsoft must do for Windows 8 in 2013



Microsoft's ambitious Windows 8 gamble may have launched this past October, but it's 2013 that will make or break the new operating system. I have five recommendations that Microsoft should implement sooner rather than later to keep Windows 8 from going the way of Vista.
Make the case for Windows RT
"That's right, it filets, it chops, it dices, slices, never stops, lasts a lifetime, mows your lawn, and it mows your lawn and it picks up the kids from school..." --Tom Waits, "Step Right Up"

Waits wasn't talking about Windows RT when he wrote and recorded "Step Right Up" in the mid-'80s, but he could've been. Microsoft wants the tablets that run the OS to be unifying devices that are portable like a tablet but powerful enough for the heavy lifting of Microsoft Office. Claiming that the OS can step up to that challenge, and actually proving that it can, are not the same thing.
Here's the problem with Windows RT: Even after writing CNET's FAQ on Windows RT, I still have problems clearly explaining what it is and why people should want it. It's "Windows 8 Lite," but it's so much more complex than that. Sure, the Surface is a nice piece of hardware, but besides its utility as a tablet-and-skateboard combo it's a hard sell.
I have a semibaked theory that Windows RT will become Windows 9, especially because of its ability to run on lower-powered, more secure ARM chips, but right now RT is closer to being the next Kin than the next Xbox.

Windows is not some in-development mobile operating system; it's the mature senior statesman of the computing world. It's on more computers than any other OS, and that's not going to change anytime soon. We know Microsoft wants the world to move as quickly as possible to Windows 8 -- there's no other explanation for the soon-to-expire $39.99 upgrade and the push for new, interesting, touch-screen hardware.Focus on apps
Though some Microsoft defenders point out that it took Google years to bulk up Android's app catalog to 500,000-plus titles, Redmond doesn't have that kind of time when it comes to Windows 8.

While it's true that Windows 8 can run legacy software just fine in Desktop mode, Metro apps are what will sell people. Some good apps currently available demonstrate the possibilities of Metro, but they don't offer a compelling reason to change your entire work flow.
The strength of iOS is that Apple's operating system is the cleanest around. Android basks in the glow of Google's best apps and services, from Gmail to Goggles to Translate to search. The Windows 8 app experience has yet to be defined, which could benefit Microsoft in that it has an open canvas to paint on.
The bad? Don't expect competitors to look the other way as Microsoft refines its app pitch to developers.
Microsoft's Panos Panay proudly shows off the Surface hardware at the company's unveiling event at Chelsea Piers in New York.
(Credit: Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)
Convertibles and hybrids need a Surface, too
The Surface hardware went a long way toward drumming up interest in Windows 8 and Windows RT, not to mention a lot of sturm und drang from Microsoft's hardware partners. While it could be interesting to see a Redmond-designed convertible or hybrid laptop, it's not strictly necessary. But what the burgeoning, occasionally confusing category does require is a hybrid or convertible that Microsoft can point to and exclaim to the public, "This!"

It may not want to, but right now all that we've seen are oversize tablet-tops with hinges. You can't easily tell people why they must have a new category of hardware without a signature device.
Wherefore art thou, settings and preferences?
Settings aren't sexy, but they shouldn't be confusing, either. Microsoft ought to make some decisions, and fast, about cleaning up the confusing mess of its under-the-hood options.

Sometimes they're behind the Settings charm in Metro. Other times they're buried in some Desktop mode window. Currently, I find it easiest to simply start typing for what I'm looking for, and let the powerful search tool do the hard work. But if Microsoft wants Windows 8 to have long-standing appeal for nonexperts, it's going to have to demystify this stuff.
Windows 8 has opens some settings from the Charm bar in the new Metro-styled interface, but others open in Desktop mode.
(Credit: Seth Rosenblatt/CNET)
Get people and businesses excited about Windows 8
Microsoft has done itself a great disservice by coming up with a fairly interesting, unique approach to the ecosystem problem, and then letting substandard marketing heighten people's questions and uncertainties.

Solving the above problems alone won't work without helping people realize what's so great about Windows 8. And without the massive license buys that businesses can provide, Windows 8 will struggle in a consumer marketplace that is increasingly turning to Macs to solve its problems.
How Microsoft can best do that I'll leave to greater marketing minds than myself. On some level, though, it would seem easiest to have compelling hardware that people want to use. The interest in the Surface is a step in the right direction, just as Samsung's Galaxy S3 and Google's Nexus 7 did wonders for Android. Maybe there's a killer "laptablet" coming at the beginning of next year, but there's little doubt that Windows 8 has a hard path to trek in 2013.